The unabated truth , is this the truths that we all seek? Is this the enigma that we all face provided that 100% of the main stream media is bought off by the very enigmatic entity that we all battle for the truth of truths? Some of these questions unfortunately are not asked, especially in the main stream media , why is this? Who owns the media outlets that we get our information from ? Who is it that controls the government and all it's inner working departments , private and public?
Well lets see.... Investigate this and you shall find out.
Rupert Murdoch:
Consider Murdoch's empire: According to Businessweek, "his satellites deliver TV programs in five continents, all but dominating Britain, Italy, and wide swaths of Asia and the Middle East. He publishes 175 newspapers, including the New York Post and The Times of London. In the U.S., he owns the Twentieth Century Fox Studio, Fox Network, and 35 TV stations that reach more than 40% of the country...His cable channels include fast-growing Fox News, and 19 regional sports channels. In all, as many as one in five American homes at any given time will be tuned into a show News Corp. either produced or delivered." But who is the real Rupert Murdoch? As this report shows, he is a far-right partisan who has used his empire explicitly to pull American political debate to the right. He is also an enabler of the oppressive tactics employed by dictatorial regimes, and a man who admits to having hidden money in tax havens. In short, there more to Rupert Murdoch than meets the eye.
Political stance:
In March 2003, Speaking at the Milken Institute Global Conference, Murdoch backed Bush government plans to invade Iraq. "We worry about what people think about us too much in this country. We have an inferiority complex, it seems," he said.
"I think what's important is that the world respects us, much more important than they love us ... There is going to be collateral damage. And if you really want to be brutal about it, better we get it done now than spread it over months," he said. [13].
In April 2004, days after major military clashes in Iraq, Murdoch wholeheartedly backed the U.S. government policy and dismissed the magnitude of the ongoing guerrilla war against coalition military forces. “We have got to see the job through. And I think it is being misrepresented. There’s tremendous progress in Iraq. All the kids are back at school – ten per cent more than when Saddam Hussein was there. There is one per cent more fresh water. There’s … most of Iraq is doing extremely well,” Murdoch said.
“There is one small part where the Sunnis are, which were the people who supported Saddam Hussein, who are giving trouble, and more by, I think, giving cover to international terrorists and people from the Taliban and from Afghanistan coming in. And it’s not - this is notable - they’re not really trying to kill Americans even, they’re trying to kill people, like, from the United Nations. Anyone who is trying to come in and help get their country going properly,” he said.
Murdoch had no doubt that the war in Iraq would have no impact on Bush’s election prospects. “They’re with him on that, completely. He’s going to walk it in. The economy is doing extremely well and, you know, there is an international crisis,” he said.
In November 2006, on the eve of the U.S. mid-term elections, Murdoch downplayed the number of deaths in Iraq. "The death toll, certainly of Americans there, by the terms of any previous war are quite minute," he said. "Of course no one likes any death toll, but the war now, at the moment, it's certainly trying to prevent a civil war and to prevent Iraqis killing each other."
"I believe it was right to go in there. I believe that certainly the execution that has followed that has included many mistakes," Murdoch said. "But that's easy to say after the event. It's much easier to criticize the conduct of the war today in the media than it was in previous wars. I'm sure there were great mistakes made in the past, too."
On January 26, 2007 Murdoch participated in a panel discussion on "Who Will Shape the Agenda?" at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. In response to the moderator asking if "News Corp. managed to shape the agenda on the war in Iraq, Murdoch said: 'No, I don't think so. We tried.' Asked by Rose for further comment, he said: 'We basically supported the Bush policy in the Middle East...but we have been very critical of his execution.'"
What about now:
The Murdoch paradox was in full evidence last week. Though he has always distrusted movies, he is gratified by the "Avatar" revenue stream, the endless bliss emanating from "American Idol" and the overall prosperity and stability of his Hollywood properties. But he is, at heart, a print man, and his critics continue to fault him for his lavish spending on newspapers. The New York Post loses an estimated $70 million a year. A year ago News Corp. took a $3 billion write down on its newspapers, reflecting the impact of the much-criticized $5 billion acquisition of the Wall Street Journal.
Other sources of news owners to come, but the bottom line is that unfortunately , most Americans like you and I are subject to the owners of the newspapers political views and stances on issues around the world. It is no longer or has been for a long time a free press, instead this had become a battle of the LEFT/RIGHT paradigms .
Many many people like you , and me , depend and rely on main steam media for our daily news and current events in the world. Well, let me tell you this , these are the types of mentalities that we need to (as Americans ) change, we are in a battle for our minds , we are in a battle for information. Truth in information is rare to say the least , there are many outlets, many of which twist and distort the truths that we ingest in and live by. Many many lies have been perpetrated by these means , more than which I care to indulge in at the moment , perhaps later in another post I will delve into these realities that you and I live on a day to day basis.
Now lets just stop here on this subject, I could go on for days and perhaps weeks on the subject of censorship in the main stream media, the amount of their personal stances on issues , pushed upon us and rammed down our throats everyday has become enough for me, as to just shut off the TV and find my news elsewhere. We should be able to get unbiased news and something that can be easily digested and not go down our throats like a cluster of nails glued together. so now lets move on to one of the biggest controversies that have been avoided as being a remote possibility by the mainstream media.
Watch these videos delving into 9/11 truth the first one is just Uncanny and too much of a coincidence to be ignored ,
This aired 6 months before 9/11, it was the first episode in the "Lone gunman " series , airing on FOX for one season, it replaced the long running and very popular series - "The X-files" The air date of this episode was march of 2001.
Now these next few videos were made after 9/11 - Strong evidence of some sort of inner conspiracy within the ranks of the Powers that be. Let's for the sake of open mindedness, just consider the evidence he provides.
This aired 6 months before 9/11, it was the first episode in the "Lone gunman " series , airing on FOX for one season, it replaced the long running and very popular series - "The X-files" The air date of this episode was march of 2001.
Now these next few videos were made after 9/11 - Strong evidence of some sort of inner conspiracy within the ranks of the Powers that be. Let's for the sake of open mindedness, just consider the evidence he provides.
PART 2-
Right now I want to talk about some of the key facts and some of the pertinent data that we as Americans need to familiarize ourselves with about 9/11 information and truths. Some of the facts may shock and disturb you but we are all in this together , you and me. It isn't about us (Americans ) and them ( Muslims ) no this is something the establishment wants and needs you to believe , they need you to believe this because if you don't then they can't perpetuate their altruistic propaganda campaign and the war on terror.
Lets look at a possible method of destruction for the three towers that fell.
Shape charges?
Ok so here we have a possible means of destruction and method as to which they were brought down,
Lets look at a possible method of destruction for the three towers that fell.
Shape charges?
The photograph below demonstrates that the WTC beams were not cut by welders.
Because of fuel and time constraints welders would have used a cutting torch to cut the shortest distance possible - straight across the beams. Also, cutting torches cut by forced oxidation, therefore the large amount of once liquid metal congealed on the beam would not be present.
Now lets explore the possible reasons why:
Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was "privatized" by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. "This is a dream come true," Larry Silverstein said. "We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights."But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe.
Deal of the Year: World Trade Center, New York, NY
Weighing in at $3.2 billion, the acquisition of the 99-year leasehold of the World Trade Center was the largest of the year. "Notwithstanding the emotional difficulty of celebrating anything related to the World Trade Center is the fact that upon completion of its acquisition by Larry Silverstein, it was clearly the deal of the year for the industry, and now more than ever, a deal of [a] lifetime for Silverstein" said Ken Zakin, managing director at Insignia/ESG. [iiRealEstate]From an economic standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since its inception -- has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. [BusinessWeek] How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this?
Also, the towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.
| It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon] |
The perfect collapse of the twin towers changed the picture.
| Under a pending agreement, a developer and his investors will get back most of the down payment that they made to lease the World Trade Center just six weeks before a terrorist attack destroyed the twin towers. Developer Larry Silverstein and investors Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre are nearing a deal that would give them about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million, The New York Times reported Saturday. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003] |
As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex.
Update: WTC Leaseholder May Collect Up To $4.6B
| A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04] |
Ok so here we have some motive..... but how did they pull this off and why? Was he alone? who else could be involved?
Ok I decided to go to some reputable sites with real scientists who answer real questions...here are some of those questions...
What's the melting point of steel?
That depends on the alloy of steel you are talking about. The term alloy is almost always used incorrectly these days, especially amongst bicyclists. They use the term to mean aluminum. What the term alloy really means is a mixture of metals, any kind of metals. Almost all metal used today is a mixture and therefore an alloy.
Most steel has other metals added to tune its properties, like strength, corrosion resistance, or ease of fabrication. Steel is just the element iron that has been processed to control the amount of carbon. Iron, out of the ground, melts at around 1510 degrees C (2750°F). Steel often melts at around 1370 degrees C (2500°F).
Author:
Brian Kross, Chief Detector Engineer (Other answers by Brian Kross)
This is important: REMEMBER THAT TEMPERATURE 2750 degrees F...
Now I go to a site to ask at what temperature does the highest grade Jet fuel burn at ?:
Typical Physical Properties for Jet A and Jet A-1
Jet A-1 Fuel must meet the specification for DEF STAN 91-91 (Jet A-1), ASTM specification D1655 (Jet A-1) and IATA Guidance Material (Kerosine Type), NATO Code F-35.Jet A Fuel must reach ASTM specification D1655 (Jet A) [4]
| Jet A-1 | Jet A | |
| Flash point: | > 38 °C (100.4 °F) | |
| Autoignition temperature: | 210 °C (410 °F) | |
| Freezing point: | > −47 °C (−52.6 °F) | > −40 °C (−40 °F) |
| Open air burning temperatures: | 287.5 °C (549.5 °F) | |
| Density at 15 °C (59 °F): | 0.775 kg/L - 0.840 kg/L | |
| Specific energy | >42.80 MJ/kg | |
[edit] Jet B
Jet B is a fuel in the naphtha-kerosene region that is used for its enhanced cold-weather performance. However, Jet B's lighter composition makes it more dangerous to handle. [5] For this reason it is rarely used except in very cold climates.HUH????? what? 549.5 degrees????? So how is it remotely possible that it was claimed to have melted the steel in the towers? Is this meant to be a joke , do they really think that we are that stupid?
The next question is : So who said that the steel was melted anyway? ok well in this aspect I am going to have to just answer that by pictures , because , well a picture is worth a thousand words.
Molten steel did not exist in the WTC buildings prior to the collapses, but...
Molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed [from WTCs 1 & 2]," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. [American Free Press]
The temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to. [ABC News, 9/18/01]
Ok so now I am seriously starting to question what it was that could have possibly made the temperatures reach that high....and even still that hot 6 weeks later? Lets look into some possibilities from evidence found and examined by scientists. There were many samples of the dust taken and was analyzed , here is an article of one such study. I will not put the whole thing but I will give you the source and the basic jist of the investigation and what they found.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705295677,00.html?pg=1
Following is a list of related websites on the internet. These websites are scholarly research oriented sites that we Architects and Engineers can have a good degree of confidence in for informing ourselves about the WTC High-rise building "collapses" on 9/11.
The full truth of the 9/11 events is complex as a whole, but relatively simple in each fact, piece of evidence, mystery, and burning question. Most of the known facts and evidence can be found presented in a variety of formats on the following websites.
We suggest you start out slowly, becoming increasingly aware, informed and educated as time passes. As the vast amount of information sinks in, the real truth of what really happened on September 11, 2001 becomes increasingly clear. And we find that what really happened bears little resemblance to the official Government fire-related "collapse" conspiracy theory story that we have been led to believe.
NYCCAN.org — [ http://nyccan.org ]
NYC CAN is non-partisan organization comprised of 9/11 Families, First Responders, Survivors and proud, concerned citizens committed to bringing about an independent, impartial investigation into the events of September 11.
The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001. All content is freely available online.
911Truth.org's mission is to expose the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11th, 2001, to promote, and in part to provide, the best in investigative reporting, scholarly research and public education regarding the realitiy of September 11th and its aftermath, and to seek justice and redress for those wronged on September 11th.
911blogger.com distributes 9/11 related news. While the blog focuses on alternative 9/11 news they do not seek to force any opinions on the subjects or articles covered, nor do they necessarily advocate the positions stated in the news they cover. It is up to the viewer of the blog to do their own research, and to reach their own opinions. The Primary Goal of 911blogger.com seeks to fill a void in the blogger community by providing a blog centrally focused on 9/11 related news. Breaking through to the blogger community provides an excellent opportunity for 9/11 researchers to reach a wide variety of politically active individuals.
WTC7.net — [ http://www.wtc7.net/ ]
Jim assembles all the background information, the evidence, the eywitnesses, the tenants, the press reports, and concludes that the 47 story World Trade Center building #7 was without a doubt demolished by Controlled Demolition with explosives.
0x1a.com — [ http://0x1a.com ]
A regularly updated site devoted to raw data and sources.
9-11 Research is an ongoing effort to discover the truth about the attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. on September 11th, 2001. To that end they provide a growing hypertext documentary of the attack and its aftermath, easily browsed archives of evidence, and a body of original analysis based on that evidence. They maintain the website as a public service.
A non-partisan association of firefighters and affiliates created to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to our Brothers and Sisters in need.
No politics. No conspiracy theories. Just facts in evidence at the scene.
Presented here are points about the destruction of the north tower, WTC 1. These points raise the question: how could this happen without massive explosive energies pre-planted before 9/11?
Visibility 9-11 with Michael Wolsey is a weekly radio program and podcast. A favorite on iTunes, this podcast is one of the longest-running programs found anywhere that focuses on exposing the fraud of September 11th, 2001.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice welcomes all persons interested in exposing the truths of the 9/11/01 attack. This group and website, like the sister site, the Journal for 9/11 Studies, seeks to present theories and evidence using the scientific method, while also encouraging and presenting related strong efforts in areas such as grand juries, media reform, protests, etc.
In the past year the the original Scholars group launched a website (ScholarsFor911Truth.org), created a peer-reviewed online journal (Journalof911Studies.com), and maintained a private moderated discussion forum for the participation of all members. We believe we have made inroads in the mainstream media and have helped to "move the ball down field" towards the truth regarding the 9/11 attacks. We look forward to engaging our new members, new group governance and continuing our ongoing dedication to seeking justice.
Many lawyers have concluded that the 9/11 Commission and other government examinations were wholly inadequate, and did not follow proper rules of evidence or procedure.
To be continued................
No comments:
Post a Comment